Website debunking the Special Assistant 
for Gulf War Illnesses

Updated: August 9th, 2005 

Come join our Organization as we face down the agency that lies about 

Gulf War issues. Deployment Health Support Directorate

 

1995 - 25,000,000 Gulf War military records declassified
1996 - 6,000,000 given to OSAGWI to put on website
1996 - 57,000 put up on gulflink.osd.mil website

 

At a cost of $178,000,000 less than .0095% of the 
Gulf War Military records have been declassified
for public release 13 years later if 99.99% is classified 

Secret or higher, did nothing medically really happen 

to Gulf War vets?

Gulf War, and Operation Iraqi Freedom

August 9th, 2005: August 5th, Friday the Canton Observer ran a story 

of local Gulf War veteran Wade E. George. A benefit Sunday the 7th 

was to be held in his honor as friends and family came to his aid. 

He had been diagnosed with a terminal lung / brain cancer, and less 

than 3 months to get his affairs in order. While the story continues 

to build, we ask that people make donations to Wade to help him with 

his expenses as he continues his radiation treatments.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gulflink/message/8649

 

August 3rd, 2005: The Iraq Infection. After working for several 

weeks with Mathew Herper of Forbes magazine, he jumps the gun, 

and releases his story minus Congressman Dennis Moore's 

information about Walter Reed Army Hospital during the height 

of the Acinetobacter Baumannii outbreak. Also, it leaves out the 

fact that information was entered into the record at Government 

Reform on July 19th about this. That DHSD had ignored the 

Acinetobacter data in its presentation to the committee on Iraqi 

health threats. As they also played it down to the IOM Infectious 

Disease committee about the circumstances around it as well. I 

was there for both.

 

Met with DHSD on July 28th, 2005. On the Centcom medical

reports that are nto explained on the OSAGWI website. Of 

which is covered in: 

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gulflink/message/8615

 

July 26th, 2005: Exposure to chemical munitions at Khamisiyah 

maybe associated with an increased risk of brain cancer death.

Additional research is required to confirm this finding.

Mortality in US Army Gulf War Veterans Possibly Exposed to 1991 Khamisiyah Chemical Munitions Destruction 

 

The Khamasiyah demolition models do not match the CHPPM 

Oil Well Fire smoke models for the month of March 1991. 

The Chppm data shows the normal trade winds for that region, 

while DHSD refused to provide weather satellite images of the 

region, probably because the smoke clouds confirm wind 

direction. Discussed on our plume data page her at DSBR. http://www.gulflink.org/fallout/plume.htm

 

July 25th, 2005: The second letter to the Whitehouse drew a 

less nasty response from Susan Mathers at VA. But, it did not 

answer our questions on the Gulf War Registry, OIF Registry, 

or current VA stats on the program. So I went to the July 19th 

Government Reform hearing that Susan testified at, and had the 

materials entered into the record. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gulflink/message/8585 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gulflink/message/8589

 

DHSD responded the following day on the Centcom medical survey

data, which took a year, and act of god to get. Immediately noted 

in this was that this was Centaf, Marcent, Navcent, but no Arcent. 

Air Force, Marines, and Navy - but no Army. However, most noted

was the cases of West Nile Virus. Meeting with DHSD to discuss 

this and other issues in more detail.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gulflink/message/8592 

 

The Veterans Disability Benefit Commission met on July 22nd, 

and it was clear from the DOD materials presented that they want 

to take over the VA side of Claims Processing. With a nearly 

empty room, they may get what they want by default.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gulflink/message/8592 

 

The Bioport Anthrax Vaccine had been protected by DOD under 

the Presidential waiver of Gulf War I. So adverse reactions were 

never really followed up, and they falsely reported the vaccine 

was safe though its different from what was licensed. Eventually 

it would have a injunction placed against it by the Supreme court. 

Now, the National Institute of Health has sanctioned giving it on 

a test basis to 100 1st and 2nd grade children. So several groups 

rallied in Washington DC to ask that this be stopped, and that 

the AVIP be revamped into a safer program for the troops. More 

needs to be done to convince the House and Senate that medical

experimentation on children of this nature is just morally wrong. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gulflink/message/8559

 

June 2nd, 2005: Leishmaniasis is a issue among American 

soldiers from the Gulf War to present OIF. In 2003 we heard the 

CDC say there wasn't a sterile cure for Leishmaniasis. After 

listening to Alan Magill's presentation to the IOM, its clear that 

the medical community can barely find Leishmaniasis even 

when looking for it. Short of the gaping sores of the Cutaneous 

variety, the skin test, and PCR are useless. The hundred year 

old method is still the best, what you see in a slide under a 

microscope. Some points are discussed on this page: 

Leishmaniasis 

 

Several things happened this week, but the most

noted was the IOM Infectious Disease meeting on May 26th. 

This is my comment on the meeting: 

May 26th IOM Infectious Disease meeting 

and this is the slides from the 4 presenter: 

IOM Infectious Disease 

 

After talking with Mike Kilpatrick at the event, I made a variety 

of complaints about his staff running interference on me. That I 

was getting the run around from them. Friday morning I had at 

least one response letters from DHSD waiting for me. 

Mail List - response from DHSD 

 

The National Archives made it clear that none of the 15 year old 

classified information from the Gulf War was going to be released 

at the 15 year "confidential" declassification mark. Instead, it was

all being reclassified. So things like the USCENTCOM medical

survey of 69,875 troops would remain classified.

 

878193.002 USAF IRIS Secret Document
CENTCOM MEDICAL SURVELILLANCE, 

16-22 DECEMBER 1990
SURVEY OF 69,875 PERSONNEL PARTICIPATING 

IN DESERT SHIELD. 
DISEASE CASE RATES REPORTED. 
FORWARDED TO CENTCOM 30 OCT 1996

 

What I don't understand is how DOD can spend $150,000,000 

to declassify this information in 1995 - use medical words as the 

protocol to find them - miss a medical survey of 69,875 troops - 

and then tell me for a year that I have to FOIA it when it was 

forwarded to OSAGWI / DHSD in 1996. Rather than DHSD 

instantly volunteering to find something that might benefit Gulf War 

veterans. Why would they refuse to look at this publicly.

 

Supposedly, Jim Binns and the Research Advisory Committee is 

looking into this also, and the AFIP Gulf War tissue catalog before 

the AFIP is disbanded in the near future. 

 

You can tell nothing is being done on Gulf War when VA hasn't 

changed its fact sheets about Gulf War Veterans Illnesses since 

April 2000. 5 years of status quo, but they show they check the 

webpages this year though they haven't changed them.

http://www1.va.gov/OPA/fact/index.htm 

http://www1.va.gov/opa/fact/gwfs.html

 

In 1998 a lot of Gulf War Veterans / advocates / and groups

were notified of NSO meetings at the Pentagon. I asked to be 

included on that fax list in 1999. Barbara Goodno, and Dian 

Lawhon made sure that never happened in all the years I 

attended NSO meetings in DC. Here is the list of names of 

people OSAGWI contacted to attend its NSO meetings 

in 1998: 

OSAGWI fax sheet 

 

May 24th, 2005: The Whitehouse finally decided to recognize

my complaint of the Department of Veteran Affairs decline in

its handling of Gulf War medical Issues. The letter is simple 

and understated, but its basically a Presidential inquiry into 

the VA. The question now is will VA ignore this as DOD ignored 

my IG complaint of of DOD's mishandling of Gulf War issues. 

My letter to the Whitehouse 

Response letter from Whitehouse

 

May 19th, 2005: The IOM Stress review will end up having to 

review its own 1997 CCEP report, as they suggested that 

DOD look into Stress nine years ago. The new IOM stress 

committee had given the impression it was unaware of CCEP, 

and needed it explained to them. So have they really forgotten 

there part in this, or are they embarrassed that they pushed 

Stress back in 1997 - which became so unpopular among the 

veterans.

http://books.nap.edu/html/ccep_focused/#ccep  

 

I talked with both the Veterans Benefit Disability Commission 

and Undersecretary Scott Hogenson at VA HQ to let them 

know the 800 number to the BVA judge has been disconnected. 

The BVA website doesnt offer a new number at this link:

http://www.va.gov/vbs/bva/page7.htm#2 

But, I got this number from them myself:

202-501-5970 #1010 
( instead of 1-800-869-8654 ) 

 

The 15 year anniversary of the Gulf War is coming up in August, and 

the any records classified "Confidential" are supposed to be released. 

The National Archives is making no effort to review the Centcom records 

vault to begin releasing its confidential records. Many like myself 

believe there is inside DOD influence on them to ignore the data. 

Especially anything related to:

 

61,652 Centcom personnel survey - Gulf War 1990 - 1991
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gulflink/message/7198

69,875 Centcom personnel survey part 2 - Gulf War 1990 - 1991 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gulflink/message/7199

 

DHSD is completely unwilling to talk on the phone or respond 

to emails, so I had to ask Dr. David S.C. Chu himself about the

DHSD program. According to the UnSEC, DHSD will remain

for 6 more years. But, its my understanding they have been 

expanded under Consolidated Health Support even though the 

Pentagon seems unwilling to disclose its current budget or 

exact current function. The budget just says $15.5 million to transfer 

OSAGWI to Defense Health program. After that all record of the 

program vanishes from the DOD Comptroller records, under any

name even under the Health Affairs budget listings. Has DHSD 

become a secret project at DOD?

 

UnSec David S.C. Chu

 

The AFIP has been slated for closing, so Im pushing the VA

RAC to hurry up in its request for a catalog of the Gulf War tissue 

samples stored there. After they close the Walter Reed location, 

it may become impossible to get this catalog from them down the 

road. I've asked countless times over four years that someone 

take advantage of this vault - and hopefully the RAC will do so.

 

The IOM meets on May 26th and 27th on its third installment,

Gulf War Infectious Disease.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gulflink/message/8372

 

Another chapter has surfaced in DOD human experimentation, 

a survivor of the Edgewood Arsenal chemical experiments from 

1955 to 1975 told me of it, and the IOM report done years later 

from it. Michael Bailey has talked about this for some time, and 

has been trying to get the word out about what happened to him 

and others with him.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gulflink/message/8375

 

May 6th, 2005: Monday the 9th, the IOM starts its review of Gulf

War Stress. This is not what we wanted for research, and are dismayed 

that VA would fund it. It shows a trend that even though we need a 

fresh outlook at the disease, even the RAC is missing the boat. 

But, Jim Binns of the RAC has assured me they will look into the 

Centcom medical survey and the AFIP vault.

 

The WRIISC clinic was not aware that in the Persian Gulf VHA 

handbook a Gulf War Registry Phase II exam can be done at the 

East Orange or Washington DC WRIISC clinics. Which is a way 

to get veterans in the WRIISC clinic which has only seen 60 veterans 

nation wide in 3 years. Another research short fall.

 

After yet another phone call with DHSD, I was reminded of one of the 

precursor elements in 1998 that sparked OSAGWI to work with me. 

I had written a letter to the President, of which he forwarded to VA 

and OSAGWI. It turns out that letter impacted them more than I 

realized which lead to a 3 year pattern in which I kept them buried 

in work. By 2001, when the new President stepped in - DHSD then 

all but tried to ignore me. So I guess they are waiting for this President 

to send one of my letters to DHSD before they wake up. 

OSAGWI Whitehouse response 1 

OSAGWI Whitehouse response 2 

 

April 27th, 2005: I had contacted Helen Malaskiewicz about

the Environmental Health Coordinator List being wrong. That each  

facility was running it different, and some facilities had changed 

coordinators or had people doubling jobs. So since then she has 

been calling every VAMC nation wide to get the right contact 

information. They didnt want to put out the list incomplete, so I 

asked that they just do so with a disclaimer that its still being 

updated. Without further a due, the updated complete EA 

coordinators list, April 2005.

Environmental Agents Coordinator List 

 

April 22nd, 2005: After asking DHSD to replace oversight 

websites taken off the list, they respond with the updates. 

They are now hosting the PAC, and PSOB websites that

have been taken down. No mention of MHVCB yet, but

the CCEP data has been updated.

DHSD response letter

 

The IOM meeting on the 20th started with Dr. Craig Hyams 

singing the DOD somatoform song, much of the day was 

disappointing as it appears this report is destined to fail as 

quickly as the others. It however was very informative, so 

read up in the commentary posting. 

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gulflink/message/8242 

 

From this we learned that 4 Gulf War IOM reviews were 

taking place, to include a Gulf War Stress review. The 

meetings are coming up in May. 

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gulflink/message/8247 

 

The WRIISC VHA handbook is now available, and with it 

the VA Form 10-0417 screening form is available on it. 

Little by little the WRIISC, and Gulf War Registry data is 

being made public. Dr. Han Kang and Dr. Mark Brown both 

agreed with me there should be a centrally located WRIISC 

clinic. I had proposed Houston, Texas - which housed the 

former Gulf War Referral Clinic. 

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gulflink/message/8249 

 

Helen explained how if your a Gulf War vet in Germany, 

your outside of VA care. If a veteran is willing to pay, 

VA might reimburse a civilian doctor to do the exam.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gulflink/message/8257 

 

In fact, there is so much happening now behind the scenes 

that this week that this above post is truncated to the max. 

Even the links are one post of many on each topic, as a 

very troubling picture unfolds of what VA says versus what 

it does. It looks like the push is to label Gulf War vets Stress 

related and support only things that lead to that conclusion. 

One thing is clear, there are no VSO's in sight, and even the 

VA Research Advisory Committee is in the dark on events 

happening inside VA. If I hadnt caught the IOM scheduling 

issue last week, it would have been the IOM staff only at the 

Tuesday meeting.

 

April 16th, 2005: The VA RAC met on the 6th thru the 8th, 

and as usual an on cue they summarily ignore the veterans in 

favor of listening to Pentagon puppets. Grabenstein uses the 

committee as a opportunity to defend the Anthrax vaccine. 

Though Jim Binns and I write each other during the session, 

he doesn't listen - of which I've heard this from even a few gov 

employees. At least they revised the GWVIS report on the 

website, I had pointed out it was VA intranet - and those of 

us on the outside cant access it. 

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gulflink/message/8166

 

EA finally puts up the WRIISC VHA handbook, but leaves off 

the VA form 10-0417 that goes with it. This form is a pre-screen 

form to get into the WRIISC. So to date, the following were 

unavailable to the veterans for several years:

Gulf War 10-9009a (RS) code Sheets

Environmental Agents Coordinators List ( updated April 2005 )

Environmental Agents Clinicians List

WRIISC VHA HANDBOOK 1303-5 July15 2004 

 

In the coming weeks I will continue to provide updates on the 

EA issue and the WRIISC clinic. Of which here is the 

WRIISC response letter, a complete blow off of my questions 

I posed to them. Like them having only 38 veterans nation wide 

get referred to the clinic in the last three years, among numerous 

other things.

 

DHSD responds to me that I'm right on the 19 problems 

I found with them, and the website. The PAC, CCEP, MHVCB, 

PSOB, and other websites no longer exist. Coupled with 

the complete degeneration of the medial page on the 

gulflink.osd.mil website, and that the VSO page at 

Deploymenthealth.osd.mil isnt updated the day of the meetings 

with the NSO's. 

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gulflink/message/8207

 

Now I find DHSD has canceled publishing valuable study information 

that might have been damaging to DOD.

http://www.dior.whs.mil/icdhome/CANRCS.PDF

 

April 1st, 2003
Part IB - List of Recurring and One-Time DoD Internal 

Reports Canceled in the Last Two Years

HA( AR) 1976 09/ 02/ 2002
REPRODUCTIVE OUTCOMES: GULF WAR VETERANS
10 USC 1074; PL 103- 337

HA( OT) 2075 08/ 11/ 2000
PERSIAN GULF ERA WOMEN'S HEALTH LINKAGE STUDY
DAMD17- 96- C- 6052 A N AF MC

SD( OT) 2066 02/ 10/ 2000
SURVEY OF PEST CONTROL PROBLEMS AND PESTICIDE
USE DURING THE GULF WAR
DEPSECDEF MEMO
961112
A N AF MC

P& R( AR) 1919 05/ 21/ 2002
CHEMICAL WEAPONS EXPOSURE STUDY REPORT
DD2733 DEPSECDEF MEMO
930309
A N AF

 

Last but not least, the IOM starts its new Gulf War literature review of 

Medical docs. But, the February 17th, 2005 meeting they do not notify 

anyone its a public meeting - so only Dr. Mark Brown attends. Notice 

was not sent out about the April 20th, 2005 meeting, and so I had to 

track down the IOM staff to get a response. Here is the reply from Caroline 

Fulco at the IOM: 

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gulflink/message/8221

 

Its obivous that the IOM wants to give the impression that no one 

cares, and this is probably something VA has pushed silently as 

well. That way the report doesnt have to start with thanks or recognition 

to myself or the NSO's like the other IOM reports in the past. So they 

can just what VA wants to hear, unopposed.

 

March 10th, 2005: Just got a hold of the new March 7th, 2005 

VHA handbook 1303.2 from Environmental Agents at VA. 

The announcement is the Persian Gulf Registry is now the 

Gulf War Registry that includes troops returning from Operation 

Iraqi Freedom. The problem is, Gulf War veterans can barely 

find their way to a Environmental Health Coordinator now due 

to a few information road blocks at Veteran Affairs Medical 

Centers. Like anything in the lobby telling of them or the program, 

or any public phone list to contact the EH coordinators, or any 

public outreach program to get them into the programs.

 

Michelle Foster of Environmental Agents finally uploaded the 

Persian Gulf Registry Code Sheets on the VA website.

http://www1.va.gov/gulfwar/Index.cfm

http://www1.va.gov/Environagents/page.cfm?pg=5  

 

This is just the beginning, as they also took down several 

items to include the outreach section. So little by little we 

will continue dialogue with EA until the program is functioning 

at a better level than it was. The Coordinators and Clinicians 

list have not been put up there yet, and so for now we are all 

that have these list available to the veteran community.

 

March 8th, 2005: Chppm is monitoring the environmental 

health conditions in Iraq. So we at DSBR suggest that 

soldiers in Iraq this year bring back soil samples of the region.

It can be tested for bacterial as well as chemical composition

by Chppm. In case you get sick, its your backup to show 

the level of soil contamination in Iraq - if that is the case.

But, bring enough for two labs - so a independent lab can 

verify Chppms results. We didn't have that in the last war. 

 

At the 1999 CDC Gulf War Conference I gave a sand sample

to Jack Heller during his presentation on Chppm in the Gulf

War. This is what the soil analysis results looked like: 

Chppm 1999 sand sample analysis results

 

March 3rd, 2005: The Gulf War Exam code sheets 

had also been removed from the Environmental Health 

coordinators page at VA: 

Ihttp://www1.va.gov/Environagents/page.cfm?pg=5

I've been assured by Helen Malaskiewicz that 

shortly the new code sheets will be put back up. 

Michelle Foster of VA Environmental agents 

hasn't quite got it done yet: 

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gulflink/message/8099

 

March 2nd, 2005: The War Related Illness & Injury 

Study Clinic had posted its DC statistics, in which 38 

veterans had been sent nationally over a 3 year period.

Which is a horrendously low figure for replacing the 

now defunct Gulf War Referral Clinics.

 

With some effort, we pinned down that Persian Gulf

Coordinators at Veteran Affairs Medical Centers had 

become invisible to veterans walking in. The once 

public positions had been changed to C&P staff 

carrying multiple rolls, and one that veterans had no

idea of. So even though Persian Gulf Registry exams

continued, they became part of a Compensation and

Pension exam - something a veteran found out after 

they filed a VA claim. Not something they saw or heard 

about in the lobby of a VA hospital.

 

Then came the issue of the Gulf War exam code sheets 

that were no longer available on the website either.

http://www1.va.gov/gulfwar/Index.cfm

http://www1.va.gov/Environagents/page.cfm?pg=5

 

In the old days the Persian Gulf Coordinators had a 

master sheet up on the VA net of all the phone numbers, 

and locations of these people. That has vanished.

So we looked to the VA / VISN phone directories, 

and found 3 remaining facilities with the Persian

Gulf Coordinator listed publicly. We called them, and 

those people were bewildered we called them Persian 

Gulf Coordinators. In our old records, the only surviving 

PGC was Ron Ratliff of the Houston VAMC - so far 

most are admin or C&P staff doubling in. No signs, 

or displays in the lobby, or literature explaining who 

they were or how to find them 

 

So we at DSBR will be building a new Persian Gulf Registry / 

WRIISC program page in conjunction with how to file 

a VA complaint page. For now we are making the Persian 

Gulf Coordinators list public again for the first time in years. 

Persian Gulf Coordinators   ( updated again April 2005 )

Persian Gulf Clinicians

 

Our goal is to make this whole program public again, 

and easy to access. So in the coming weeks we will be 

conferring with VA Environmental Agents in conjunction 

with Deployment Health Support Directorate to rectify 

problems from PGR to WRIISC. Its confusing, but it 

doesn't have to stay that way.

 

February 24th, 2005: A "Tiger Team" has been 

working the last few weeks to procure a variety of

documents from the OSAGWI server. Today we got 

the 2nd page to the July 22nd, 1997 letter to Edward 

D. Martin from Michael A. Friedman. The letter given 

the Senate VA committee, but missing this page since

since 1997. 8 years this went uncorrected.

 

The sequence went page 273 to 274, but when you 

read the document you see that it skips from 1 to page 3

Original File:

http://www.gulflink.osd.mil/library/senate/appx_ee.pdf

Our updated 14 page file with page 2:

http://www.gulflink.org/senate/appx_ee.pdf 928KB

 

On February 7th we also found the Presidential Advisory

Committee website wasn't available anymore, what was 

left of it resided on OSAGWI's Gulflink.osd.mil . But, 

parts of it were not functioning there either. Noticeably 

missing was the Special Report 12/96. The below 

message is a the message sent to DHSD requesting 

those files, and link corrections.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gulflink/message/8009

More to follow.......

February 11th, 2005: It appears the Senate is busy 

trying to find ways to further cheat soldiers / veterans

who have been injured in the line of duty.

 

Veteran Affairs has closely guarded the secret that family

members of a veteran who has hurt or killed in VA care

could file against VA with a SF 95 Tort claim through the

Department of Justice. 

How to complain to Veteran Affairs about your health care

 

So now they are trying to find ways to limit judgments. 

Problem is, VA is great at avoiding going to court by using 

technicalities to get cases dismissed. If a veteran or family 

members ever even hear of this closely guarded procedure.

Few win this procedure, which after years of fighting the debts 

sometimes outweigh the ruling judgment. 

 

What needs to be done is get the $160 billion back from

Bush that he wasted in Iraq, and pay for the war himself 

instead of disabled families waiting for years in judicial courts

from the fallout of injuries suffered in Iraq.

 

January 6th, 2005: For those that visit a VA Medical 

Center, and you had trouble with them - I'm working on

a new page that deals with how to file a complaint as a

Gulf War veteran should problems arise in your VA care. 

For now the page will be generic, rather than state to

state specific. But, if others help in each state I can

narrow names and phone numbers down better. Also, if

veterans will send the information - I will build a complaint 

page showing complaints of VAMC's in each state.

VAMC care complaint page

 

December 20th, 2004: The Gulf War and Health, Volume 3: 

Fuels, Combustion Products, and Propellants report is available

at the IOM website. Its a 600 page report, but in the 

Executive Summary at least common OSHA findings of

Cancers are conceded. The rest of the report is the IOM

doing everything it can to distance DOD, and the Gulf War

veterans from any causal effects. Even common ones. So that 

there wont be any effort to link sick vets to anything even obvious, 

and lets DOD continue its Somatization campaign. 

 

Acinetobacter Baumanii is found in the soil of Iraq, which means 

this very rare super bug will continue to infect troops in Iraq. Its 

not treatable with most known antibiotics, and is not curable. Yet, 

DHSD has taken a cavalier attitude towards it which is reflected 

in its November 30th, 2004 NSO meeting even though other 

countries started recognizing the outbreak in March 2003. 

Now at 102 injured American soldiers coming from Iraq. If you 

were at Walter Reed Army Hospital being treated for Cutaneous 

Leishmaniasis, you probably had this as well. We at DSBR 

believe this enough to buy the domain name http://www.Acinetobacter.org 

and start a website to track soldiers within this issue. 

 

Since September 2002 we have met with a plethora of government 

agencies on the current Gulf War II. The IOM, VA, DHSD, GAO, 

and others. We have also been in the global media, and recently 

finished a media tour of Germany. Some of this is outlined on the 

following web page.

Gulf War II  in review 

 

We continue here at DSBR to ask questions, and ask that you join
our discussion group at GulfLINK Mail List. Not to worry, by joining 
our list you will see that OSAGWI will also see your message as well -
they ( and many other government agencies ) monitor us daily for news
and updates.

  

                   Sincerely
                   Kirt P. Love
                   Disabled Gulf War Veteran 

             

 

                     

                      April 15th 2003

---

The Turkey Awards:

Given to those individuals 
that  struggle to make Gulf War
veterans lives worse instead
of better. 

       

This service is brought to you by the

The Desert Storm Battle Registry

 

Gulflink.org is a member of the

                                                 You are the  th visitor to this site